The genome sequence of the Lesser Skullcap, Scutellaria minor Huds., 1762 (Lamiaceae)

We present a genome assembly from an individual Scutellaria minor (Tracheophyta; Magnoliopsida; Lamiales; Lamiaceae). The genome sequence is 341.8 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 14 chromosomal pseudomolecules. The mitochondrial and plastid genome assemblies have lengths of 376.64 kilobases and 152.59 kilobases in length, respectively.


Background
Scutellaria minor is a perennial herb usually found in wet heaths, bogs, marshes and generally acidic soils.Belonging to the mint family (Lamiaceae), the plant grows up to 25 cm tall with small pinkish flowers and is distributed through the southern temperate regions of Europe (Stace et al., 2019).Found mainly in the southern regions of Britain and Ireland, S. minor populations have since declined, particularly in the Midlands, due to drainage and loss of habitat (Stroh et al., 2023).
Several species within the genus Scutellaria have historically been used in traditional medicinal practices to treat ailments and disease, including respiratory, cardiovascular and neurological diseases (Grzegorczyk-Karolak et al., 2016;Shen et al., 2021).Other species within the genus have proven anticancer, anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory properties (Cheng et al., 2018;de Boer et al., 2005).The variety of bioactive compounds found in the leaves and roots of this genus have been studied extensively due to their potential medicinal value, with more than 295 compounds having been identified so far (Georgieva et al., 2019;Shang et al., 2010).The two main groups of bioactive compounds found in Scutellaria are flavonoids and diterpenes, both of which are found in high concentrations (Georgieva et al., 2019;Shang et al., 2010).Flavonoids and their derivatives have been confirmed to have anti-tumour, anti-mutagenic, neuroprotective and hepatoprotective properties (Shang et al., 2010).While the diterpenoids isolated from Scutellaria have been of interest due to their biological pest control potential as anti-feedant and anti-fungal agents to prevent damage to economically important crops (Cole et al., 1990).
Cytologically, studies have reported this species to have a chromosome count of either 2n = 28 (e.g. in material from Sweden) or 2n = c.32 (e.g.material from UK) (Henniges et al., 2022;Morton, 1973;Ranjbar & Mahmoudi, 2013).In both cases the authors consider this species to be a tetraploid given that other species in the genus have been reported to have 2n = 14 or 2n = 16.Nevertheless, whether the species is an auto-or allo-polyploid is currently unclear.
The whole genome assembly of S. minor is expected to elucidate further properties and uses of the bioactive chemicals present within this diverse genus.

Genome sequence report
The genome was sequenced from one specimen of Scutellaria minor (Figure 1) collected from Jodrell Laboratory Glasshouses at the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, where it was grown from seed from the Millennium Seed Bank (seed accession number 678632).Using flow cytometry, the genome size (1C-value) was estimated to be 0.43 pg, equivalent to 420 Mb.A total of 54-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads was generated.Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data.Manual assembly curation corrected 3 missing joins or mis-joins, reducing the scaffold number by 15.38%.
The final assembly has a total length of 341.8 Mb in 20 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 21.8 Mb (Table 1).The snail plot in Figure 2 provides a summary of the assembly statistics, while the distribution of assembly scaffolds on GC proportion and coverage is shown in Figure 3.The cumulative assembly plot in Figure 4 shows curves for subsets of scaffolds assigned to different phyla.Most (99.12%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 14 chromosomal-level scaffolds, indicating the individual sequenced has a chromosome count of 2n = 28.Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size (Figure 5; Table 2).While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype.Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited.The mitochondrial and plastid genomes were also assembled and can be found as contigs within the multifasta file of the genome submission.

Sample acquisition, genome size estimation and nucleic acid extraction
A specimen of Scutellaria minor (specimen ID KDTOL10114, ToLID daScuMino1) was picked by hand from the Jodrell

Genome assembly, curation and evaluation
Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm (Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups (Guan et al., 2020).The assembly was then scaffolded with Hi-C data (Rao et al., 2014) using YaHS (Zhou et al., 2023).The assembly was checked for contamination and corrected as described previously (Howe et al., 2021).
Manual curation was performed using HiGlass (Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and PretextView (Harry, 2022).The mitochondrial and plastid genomes were assembled using MBG (Rautiainen & Marschall, 2021) from PacBio HiFi reads mapping to related genomes.A representative circular sequence was selected for each from the graph based on read coverage.
Table 3 contains a list of relevant software tool versions and sources.Further, the Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use.The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so we align with best practice wherever possible.The overarching areas of consideration are: • Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the material

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described? Yes
Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others? Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. 1.
The result need to be reorganized, not just show the figure.They must to be fully explained and described. 2.
The manuscript lacks information regarding the coverage of the genome assembly.It would be valuable to include details about the sequencing depth and coverage achieved in the study.This information is essential for assessing the reliability and completeness of the genome assembly.
3. Reviewer Expertise: crop breeding I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Photograph of the Scutellaria minor (daScuMino1) specimen used for genome sequencing.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Genome assembly of Scutellaria minor, daScuMino1.1:metrics.The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness.The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 342,281,700 bp assembly.The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (36,764,200 bp, shown in red).Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (21,760,285 and 17,994,855 bp), respectively.The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude.The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot.A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the eudicots_odb10 set is shown in the top right.An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/daScuMino1_1/dataset/daScuMino1_1/snail.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Genome assembly of Scutellaria minor, daScuMino1.1:BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot.Scaffolds are coloured by phylum.Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length.Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis.An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/daScuMino1_1/dataset/daScuMino1_1/blob.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Genome assembly of Scutellaria minor, daScuMino1.1:BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot.The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds.Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule.An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/daScuMino1_1/dataset/daScuMino1_1/cumulative.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Genome assembly of Scutellaria minor, daScuMino1.1:Hi-C contact map of the daScuMino1.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass.Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom.An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=S8hyWCfwRq2qMhenu7cSyA.

Wellcome
Sanger Institute -Legal and Governance The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner.The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the 'Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice', which can be found in full on the Darwin Tree of Life website here.By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project.

Table 1 . Genome data for Scutellaria minor, daScuMino1.1. Project accession data
Oatley et al., 2023): in brief, the method employs a 1.8X ratio of AMPure PB beads to sample to eliminate shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA.The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit.Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.
(Bates et al., 2023)07) Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, UK (latitude 51.48, longitude -0.29) on 2020-09-10.The specimen was grown from seed from the Millennium Seed Bank.The specimen was collected by Sahr Mian (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) and identified by Maarten Christenhusz (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) and frozen at -80 °C.The genome size was estimated by flow cytometry using the fluorochrome propidium iodide and following the 'one-step' method as outlined inPellicer et al. (2021).The General Purpose Buffer (GPB) supplemented with 3% PVP and 0.08% (v/v) beta-mercaptoethanol was used for isolation of nuclei(Loureiro et al., 2007), and the internal calibration standard was Solanum lycopersicum 'Stupiké polní rané' with an assumed 1C-value of 968Mb (Doležel et al., 2007).HMW DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12-20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 31(Bates et al., 2023).Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation (RNA was extracted from leaf tissue of daScuMino1 in the Tree of Life Laboratory at the WSI using the RNA Extraction: Automated MagMax™ mirVana protocol(do Amaral et al.,  2023).The RNA concentration was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and a Qubit Fluorometer using the Qubit RNA Broad-Range Assay kit.Analysis of the integrity